Bone Grafts Research - Spine Fusion, Surgery, Procedure, Risks

Bone Grafts Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Bone Grafts, including details on spine fusion, surgery, procedure, risks.


Bone Grafts Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Bone Grafts

Books on Bone Grafts

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Biological activity of tri-calciumphosphate/hydroxyl-apatite granules mixed with impacted morsellized bone graft. A study in rabbits.

Arts JJ, Walschot LH, Verdonschot N, Schreurs BW, Buma P

Orthopedic Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopedics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Reconstruction of bone defects with impacted morsellized cancellous bone grafts (MCB) is a popular method. Because of a shortage of human bone, mixing with biomaterials may be attractive. Ceramics may be used as bone graft extenders. In this study, various volume mixtures of biphasic tri-calciumphosphate/hydroxyl-apatite (TCP-HA) granules (1.5-2 mm) with MCB were examined in a non-loaded defect model in rabbits. Direct post-operatively, many 10-150 microm TCP-HA particles were present due to impaction. Irrespective to the group, after 8 weeks, virtually all MCB was resorbed and most TCP-HA granules were osseous-integrated with newly formed bone. The cross-sectional areas of TCP-HA after 8 weeks was generally smaller compared with direct post-operatively and the number of small 10-150 microm TCP-HA particles seemed reduced. Macrophages and giant cells were sparse after 8 weeks. In conclusion, the osteoconductivity of various mixtures of MCB and TCP-HA granules is not dependent on the ratio of TCP-HA over MCB. The reduced number of the 10-150microm TCP-HA particles after 8 weeks, may suggest that a cellular mediated resorption process of TCP-HA granules took place. Based on these favorable biological findings subsequent in-vivo experiments are warranted in load-bearing conditions to investigate whether these findings hold for joint reconstruction purposes.

Published 14 May 2007 in J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 81(2): 476-85.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Bone Grafts Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Bone Grafts Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (September)
  Issue 2 (October)
  Issue 3 (November)
  Issue 4 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)



Bone Grafts Books

The Sinus Bone Graft

The Sinus Bone Graft