Bone Grafts Research - Spine Fusion, Surgery, Procedure, Risks

Bone Grafts Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Bone Grafts, including details on spine fusion, surgery, procedure, risks.


Bone Grafts Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Bone Grafts

Books on Bone Grafts

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



The impact of post-thaw colony-forming units-granulocyte/macrophage on engraftment following unrelated cord blood transplantation in pediatric recipients.

Yoo KH, Lee SH, Kim HJ, Sung KW, Jung HL, Cho EJ, Park HK, Kim HA, Koo HH

1Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

We retrospectively reviewed the engraftment kinetics following unrelated cord blood transplantation (CBT) in association with the post-thaw colony-forming units-granulocyte/macrophage (CFU-GM) number along with the numbers of total nucleated cells (TNC), CD34(+) cells and CD3(+) cells. A total of 71 cord blood units prepared for 53 patients (double-unit CBT in 18 patients) were evaluated. Either the number of infused CFU-GM or CD34(+) cells was significantly lower in patients who failed to achieve engraftment (P=0.028 and 0.005, respectively). Post-thaw CFU-GM, TNC and CD34(+) cells correlated with the speed of neutrophil engraftment (P=0.004, 0.037 and 0.004, respectively), whereas only CFU-GM showed a significant correlation with platelet engraftment (r=-0.385, P=0.024). In double-unit transplants, the number of CFU-GM was the only significant factor predicting engraftment of the predominating unit (P=0.006). We conclude that the post-thaw CFU-GM number is a reliable predictor of rapid engraftment after CBT as well as of the predominating unit in double-unit transplants. Thus, it would be important to perform post-thaw CFU-GM assay on cryopreserved aliquots from several candidate cord blood units in advance before CBT to avoid selecting the unit that might possess a low clonogenic potential.Bone Marrow Transplantation advance online publication, 5 March 2007; doi:10.1038/sj.bmt.1705629.

Published 5 March 2007 in Bone Marrow Transplant.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Bone Grafts Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Bone Grafts Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (September)
  Issue 2 (October)
  Issue 3 (November)
  Issue 4 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)



Bone Grafts Books

Bone Grafts And Bone Graft Substitutes (Monograph Series (American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons))

Bone Grafts And Bone Graft Substitutes (Monograph Series (American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons))