Bone Grafts Research - Spine Fusion, Surgery, Procedure, Risks

Bone Grafts Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Bone Grafts, including details on spine fusion, surgery, procedure, risks.


Bone Grafts Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Bone Grafts

Books on Bone Grafts

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Dual hydroxyapatite composite with porous and solid parts: experimental study using canine lumbar interbody fusion model.

Kaito T, Mukai Y, Nishikawa M, Ando W, Yoshikawa H, Myoui A

Department of Orthopaedics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan. t-kaito@leto.eonet.ne.jp

Hydroxyapatite (HA) has been evaluated for use in a variety of applications in bone reconstruction surgery because of its high affinity with host bone and biocompatibility. However, because of the difficulty in combining porosity (for bone ingrowth) and strength in HA, it is generally considered inappropriate to use HA for high-load applications such as spinal interbody fusion. In the present study, we constructed a HA implant for spinal interbody fusion, composed of a dual HA composite (DHC) that combines two HA materials with different porosities: HA with 75% porosity, for bone ingrowth; and HA with 0% porosity, for load bearing. We used a canine lumbar interbody fusion model to evaluate bone conduction of the implant and its efficacy for bony fusion. Six months after the operation, DHC exhibited almost the same efficacy for bony fusion as iliac bone grafts. Moreover, pores of the porous part of the DHC were completely filled with newly formed bone and bone marrow cells. The present findings indicate that DHC is suitable for use as an implant material for spinal interbody fusion as a substitute for iliac bone grafts, which could eliminate the disadvantages associated with autograft harvesting.

Published 14 August 2006 in J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 78(2): 378-84.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Bone Grafts Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Bone Grafts Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (September)
  Issue 2 (October)
  Issue 3 (November)
  Issue 4 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)



Bone Grafts Books

Bone Grafts and Bone Substitutes: Basic Science and Clinical Applications

Bone Grafts and Bone Substitutes: Basic Science and Clinical Applications