Bone Grafts Research - Spine Fusion, Surgery, Procedure, Risks

Bone Grafts Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Bone Grafts, including details on spine fusion, surgery, procedure, risks.


Bone Grafts Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Bone Grafts

Books on Bone Grafts

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Three-dimensional finite-element analysis investigating the biomechanical effects of human mandibular reconstruction with autogenous bone grafts.

Tie Y, Wang DM, Ji T, Wang CT, Zhang CP

Institute of Life Quality via Mechanical Engineering, School of Mechanical and Power Energy Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University (SJTU), China.

PURPOSE: To investigate the biomechanics of the mandible following reconstruction with autogenous bone grafts. MATERIAL: Computerized tomography scan images of a human mandible, fibula and iliac crest were collected and used to build models on a PC. METHODS: Four finite-element analysis (FEA) models of mandibles reconstructed with autogenous bone were created. The principal stresses of marked points, the Von Mises stresses at anatomical index regions, and the force values of temporo-mandibular joints and masticatory muscles were calculated. RESULTS: Compared with the normal mandible, the one repaired with a fibula had greater Von Mises stresses on the grafted bone; the one repaired with iliac crest bone had the similar distribution of the Von Mises stresses as in the normal mandible. The principal stresses in the autograft varied between tensile and compressive stresses from the right graft/bone binding interface to the left in all reconstructed mandibles. On the whole, the maximum Von Mises stress was greater on the mandible reconstructed with fibula than that reconstructed with iliac crest. CONCLUSION: Mandibles repaired with iliac crest grafts have more mechanical properties similar to normal than those repaired with fibula grafts.

Published 3 July 2006 in J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 34(5): 290-8.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Bone Grafts Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Bone Grafts Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (September)
  Issue 2 (October)
  Issue 3 (November)
  Issue 4 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)



Bone Grafts Books

Bone Grafts and Bone Substitutes: Basic Science and Clinical Applications

Bone Grafts and Bone Substitutes: Basic Science and Clinical Applications