Bone Grafts Research - Spine Fusion, Surgery, Procedure, Risks

Bone Grafts Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Bone Grafts, including details on spine fusion, surgery, procedure, risks.


Bone Grafts Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Bone Grafts

Books on Bone Grafts

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Influence of the porosity of hydroxyapatite ceramics on in vitro and in vivo bone formation by cultured rat bone marrow stromal cells.

Okamoto M, Dohi Y, Ohgushi H, Shimaoka H, Ikeuchi M, Matsushima A, Yonemasu K, Hosoi H

Department of Otolaryngology, Nara Medical University School of Medicine, Kashihara, Japan, mokamoto@naramed-u.ac.jp.

The in vitro and in vivo osteoblastic differentiation of rat bone marrow stromal cells (MSCs) was assessed on hydroxyapatite disks with 3 different porosities: 30%, 50%, and 70% (HA30, HA50, and HA70, respectively). MSCs obtained by 10-day culture of fresh bone marrow cells were subcultured for 2 weeks on 3 kinds of porous HA disks in the presence and absence of dexamethasone (Dex). After 2 weeks of subculture, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and osteocalcin production of MSCs/HA composites with Dex were higher than those without, and increased with increasing porosity. The resultant bone tissue grafts "cultured-bone/HA constructs" were implanted subcutaneously into the backs of syngeneic rats, and harvested 1, 2, and 4 weeks after implantation. At 1 week, only cultured-bone/HA70 constructs exhibited expanded bone formation. At 2 and 4 weeks, active osteoblasts and progressive bone formation were observed morphologically in both cultured-bone/HA50 and HA70 constructs. At 4 weeks, bone tissue was observed even in cultured-bone/HA30 constructs. ALP activity and osteocalcin production also increased with increasing porosity and time after implantation. In this in vivo model, different scaffold porosity with similar crystal morphology of the apatite phase demonstrated marked differences in ability to support osteogenesis by implanted rat MSCs.

Published 17 April 2006 in J Mater Sci Mater Med, 17(4): 327-36.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Bone Grafts Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Bone Grafts Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (September)
  Issue 2 (October)
  Issue 3 (November)
  Issue 4 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)



Bone Grafts Books

Bone Grafts and Bone Substitutes: Basic Science and Clinical Applications

Bone Grafts and Bone Substitutes: Basic Science and Clinical Applications