Bone Grafts Research - Spine Fusion, Surgery, Procedure, Risks

Bone Grafts Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Bone Grafts, including details on spine fusion, surgery, procedure, risks.


Bone Grafts Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Bone Grafts

Books on Bone Grafts

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Prolonged-fresh preservation of intact whole canine femoral condyles for the potential use as osteochondral allografts.

Williams JM, Virdi AS, Pylawka TK, Edwards RB, Markel MD, Cole BJ

Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Rush Medical College at Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612-3864, USA. james_m_williams@rush.edu

Defects in articular cartilage are often repaired with fresh osteochondral grafts. While fresh allografts provide viable chondrocytes, logistic limitations require surgical implantation within seven days of graft harvest. Here, we provide information on cold preservation of whole intact osteochondral materials that retains cartilage cell viability and function, and histologic and biochemical integrity for 28 days. Canine femoral condyles were obtained and stored at 4 degrees C for 14, 21 or 28 days. At the end of the storage period, cartilage was assessed for cell viability, 35S uptake, proteoglycan content and histologic parameters. The most noticeable histologic change was reduced Safranin-O near the cartilage surface with 14 days of cold preservation, but had recovered with 21 and 28 days. Cartilage thicknesses did not vary significantly. Cell viability was >95% at 14 days, 75-98% at 21 days and reduced to 65-90% at 28 days. Cell function measures showed that the level of 35SO4 incorporation was suppressed in samples stored at 4 degrees C. However, no significant differences were seen among groups at 14, 21 or 28 days of cold preservation. This data has implications for tissue banking protocols for osteochondral allograft material obtained for transplantation suggesting that cold preserved allograft material be implanted within 28 days.

Published 18 July 2005 in J Orthop Res, 23(4): 831-7.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Bone Grafts Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Bone Grafts Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (September)
  Issue 2 (October)
  Issue 3 (November)
  Issue 4 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)



Bone Grafts Books

Clinical and Diagnostic Pathology of Graft-versus-Host Disease

Clinical and Diagnostic Pathology of Graft-versus-Host Disease