Bone Grafts Research - Spine Fusion, Surgery, Procedure, Risks

Bone Grafts Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Bone Grafts, including details on spine fusion, surgery, procedure, risks.


Bone Grafts Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Bone Grafts

Books on Bone Grafts

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Injury to the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of horizontal versus vertical harvest site incisions.

Portland GH, Martin D, Keene G, Menz T

Illinois Bone and Joint Institute, Glenview, Illinois 60025, USA. gcbportland@yahoo.com

PURPOSE: Damage to the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve (IPBSN) has been described for knee arthrotomy and arthroscopy. The true incidence of damage to this structure during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has not been reported. Furthermore, the traditional vertical incision for central patellar tendon harvesting runs perpendicular to the course of this nerve. Therefore, a horizontal incision to avoid this potential complication was developed. TYPE OF STUDY: Case series. METHODS: A retrospective comparative study of ACL reconstructions was performed in 76 patients with central third patellar tendon as graft with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Forty-two patients had a horizontal incision and 34 patients had a vertical incision. A questionnaire was used to evaluate function, satisfaction, and evidence of IPBSN damage. RESULTS: There was no difference between the 2 groups with regard to scar length, pain at rest, and pain with activity. Patients with a horizontal incision were more satisfied with the cosmetic appearance of their scar (P < .004). Twenty patients (59%) with a vertical incision had evidence of damage to the IPBSN as opposed to 18 patients (43%) with a horizontal incision. CONCLUSIONS: Although technically slightly more difficult, a horizontal incision may be a useful option for ACL graft harvesting to provide a more satisfactory scar with less risk of IPBSN damage. Regardless of the incision used, damage to the IPBSN is a potential complication and patients should be counseled of this preoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Published 9 March 2005 in Arthroscopy, 21(3): 281-5.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Bone Grafts Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Bone Grafts Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (September)
  Issue 2 (October)
  Issue 3 (November)
  Issue 4 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)



Bone Grafts Books

Bone Grafts And Bone Graft Substitutes (Monograph Series (American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons))

Bone Grafts And Bone Graft Substitutes (Monograph Series (American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons))