Bone Grafts Research - Spine Fusion, Surgery, Procedure, Risks

Bone Grafts Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Bone Grafts, including details on spine fusion, surgery, procedure, risks.


Bone Grafts Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Bone Grafts

Books on Bone Grafts

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



The load of an implanted graft during and after fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Yoshihara Y, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M, Yamamoto T, Kuroda R, Muratsu H

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0017, Japan. yoshiya@med.kobe-u.ac.jp

Although the importance of initial graft load has been discussed in the literature, it has not been confirmed whether a surgeon can provide the desired load to an implanted graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare the set force (initial load given to the graft before fixation) and residual load in the implanted graft using three different fixation techniques. A total of ninety porcine knees were tested using bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft. Each bone-tendon-bone autograft was fixed to the tibia with either the interference-fit screw, fixation post, or button technique. Graft load was monitored during fixation procedures, and for 10 min after fixation. Residual graft load with each fixation technique exhibited unique features. Highest graft load was obtained by the interference-screw fixation technique; however, the graft was usually over-loaded beyond the intended set force with this technique. In the fixation-post technique, the load of the graft increased while the screw was retightened. The graft load in the button-fixation technique was low, probably due to slight slippage of the button. When the graft was fixed under maximum manual tension, the graft loads at completion of fixation for the interference fit screw, fixation post, and button techniques were 116.3, 54.2, and 25.9 N respectively.

Published 9 March 2005 in Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 13(2): 101-6.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Bone Grafts Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Bone Grafts Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (September)
  Issue 2 (October)
  Issue 3 (November)
  Issue 4 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)



Bone Grafts Books

Bone Grafts And Bone Graft Substitutes (Monograph Series (American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons))

Bone Grafts And Bone Graft Substitutes (Monograph Series (American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons))