Bone Grafts Research - Spine Fusion, Surgery, Procedure, Risks

Bone Grafts Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Bone Grafts, including details on spine fusion, surgery, procedure, risks.


Bone Grafts Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Bone Grafts

Books on Bone Grafts

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Surgical reconstruction of maxilla and midface: clinical outcome and factors relating to postoperative complications.

Smolka W, Iizuka T

Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland. wenko.smolka@insel.ch

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the success rate of different techniques of repairing maxillary and midfacial defects according to their extent. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 47 maxillary reconstructions in 41 patients were reviewed. Evaluation took place an average of 4.5 years postoperatively. The cases were divided into three groups according to the classification of Brown et al. (Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40: 183-190, 2002): Group 1: maxillary defects limited to one side (Class 2a); Group 2: bimaxillary defects (Classes 2b and 2c); Group 3: maxillary/midfacial defects (Classes 3 and 4). Most reconstructions were performed with non-vascularized bone grafts in the first patient group, whilst microvascular soft tissue flaps combined with free bone grafts were used in the second group, and re-vascularized osteocutaneous flaps in the third group. RESULTS: Overall flap survival was 79%. Dental reconstruction was successfully completed in 31 cases (66%). Postoperative infection leading to transplant loss was the main reason for failure. This complication was specifically associated with temporal osteomuscular flaps (50%) and free iliac crest grafts (61%) and was related to the extent of the defect. In the reconstructive methods evaluated here, associated radiotherapy had a minor influence on the occurrence of complications. CONCLUSION: Non-vascularized iliac bone grafts should be used sparingly in Class 2b, even in combination with microvascular flaps. There is a very limited indication for these grafts in Classes 3 and 4. Temporal osteomuscular flaps do not seem to be suitable for maxillary reconstruction.

Published 7 February 2005 in J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 33(1): 1-7.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Bone Grafts Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Bone Grafts Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (September)
  Issue 2 (October)
  Issue 3 (November)
  Issue 4 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)



Bone Grafts Books

Osseointegration and Autogenous Onlay Bone Grafts: Reconstruction of the Edentulous Atrophic Maxilla (Osseointegration and Autogenous Onlay Bone Grafts)

Osseointegration and Autogenous Onlay Bone Grafts: Reconstruction of the Edentulous Atrophic Maxilla (Osseointegration and Autogenous Onlay Bone Grafts)